K9re11

Hi K9re11. Please stop that. I don't see any reason for deleting that article. --Holder (Diskussion) 13:29, 8. Mär. 2016 (MEZ)Beantworten

Have you taken a look at the link [1]? It is not notable, cross-wiki-spam, a hoax picture has been uploaded of it (see [2]), it has been deleted in English, Italian, Norwegian, Swedish, Basque, Hungarian... As an administrator, you should not simply revert without comment and protect the page. Take a look at the issue before you revert. The articles are relatively well-written, but at a closer look, they have no notability. K9re11 (Diskussion) 14:13, 8. Mär. 2016 (MEZ)Beantworten

Yes, I've read that discussion. I agree that this picture is a photomontage but it isn't used in our article. And for our Wikipedia it does not matter if an article has been deleted in other language versions. For us it's sufficient if it has been proven that this organisation really exists. --Holder (Diskussion) 14:21, 8. Mär. 2016 (MEZ)Beantworten

If you really have no other criteria for relevance than mere existence, then I understand, but I am very surprised to see you indicating that. K9re11 (Diskussion) 14:31, 8. Mär. 2016 (MEZ)Beantworten

Abschnitt zuefiege